Friday, April 22, 2011

WHEDA announcements

The Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA) has announced the 2011 awards for the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC).  I blogged previously on the applicants.

The only development in Waukesha County to receive tax credits is Wilkinson Manor in Oconomowoc which is an acquisition & rehab that will target mostly people who are elderly.  The award of $573,582 will be for 76 units. Tom  Daykin at the Journal-Sentinel reported on Milwaukee awards here and here.

The one of the applicants from Waukesha County was Fox Chase Apartments in Eagle targeting the older adults which would've had 48 units (41 Low-Income) and it is classified as "on hold" in case more funding is available if one of the other applicants is unable to make their deal work.  They would also be eligible to apply for the next round of funding.  The same is true of Riverview Commons Senior Living which is a planned Residential Care Apartment Complex (RCAC) with 55 units (all but two low-income).

As you may have noticed, and I previously criticized, all those are serving people who are elderly, with no consideration for other people who are low-income.

In other news, WHEDA also announced the availability of $500,000 through the WHEDA Foundation. 

Beneficiaries of this program include: the homeless, runaway youth, alcohol or drug dependent persons, persons in need of protective services, domestic abuse victims, developmentally disabled, low income or frail elderly persons, chronically mentally ill, physically impaired or disabled, people living with HIV disease, and persons without access to traditional housing.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Commerce Housing Programs Move Update

You may remember that when the transformation of the Department of Commerce into the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) was announced, I predicted that the housing programs in the Department of Commerce would be moved to the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority (WHEDA).  Although it was initially announced that the housing programs would be sent to WEDC, my prediction turned out to be spot-on after the proposed budget showed that the housing programs would, indeed, be moved to WHEDA.

Are you keeping up with me?  Let's review a bit of history:  The housing programs were housed in the Department of Administration, then moved into the Department of Commerce a few years ago.  After the elections, it was announced that they would be going along with the Department of Commerce into WEDC.  When the state budget was released, it showed them going into WHEDA, although there were rumors that the Director of Commerce (who would also be the Director of WEDC) wanted to keep the housing programs. 

So you can imagine, then, my exasperation upon learning that the WI Division of Housing & Community Development may be moving to the Department of Administration, their former home.  All this has to happen by July 1, 2011, by the way.  There are pros and cons to this, but all this indecision makes me wonder how committed the administration is to housing.

Monday, April 18, 2011

NLIHC's Advocates Guide

The National Low-Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) publishes an Advocates' Guide to Housing and Development Policy annually for its members, and makes it available on their website.  It is a great resource, especially for people who may not be familiar with all of the various housing programs.  It comes in at 275 pages, but really, much of it is descriptions of programs and policies, so there's no need to read the entire thing all the way through.  Read whatever strikes your fancy.

For instance, the complaint to HUD by the Metropolitan Milwaukee Fair Housing Council (MMFHC) might be something you want to learn more about.  MMFHC alleges that:
In order to receive federal funds, including CDBG and HOME dollars, Waukesha County must certify to HUD that it analyzes impediments to fair housing and takes action to overcome identified impediments. MMFHC’s complaint alleges that the County has failed to comply with its own civil rights certifications and has continued funding local governments whose laws and policies perpetuate racial and ethnic segregation.

You may be thinking "what the heck is impediments to fair housing?!?"  Go to the handy Advocates' Guide and in the Table of Contents, you see " Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice " on Page 16.  At that page and the next few, you learn the background of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing and how communities are required to do an "Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choices" to identify the barriers in the communities and to take steps toward removing those barriers.  They even give some guidance to advocates!

Sunday, April 17, 2011

False rumor

During the weekend, I came across a rumor that home sales in 2012 now would be taxed to help pay for the new health care law.  Like any responsible person, I researched the rumor to see if it was true.  I found that this rumor is apparently making the rounds via e-mails and blogs.

First, let's see what it says.  Below is a variation of what I've seen online:

"Under the new health care bill -- did you know that all real estate transactions will be subject to a 3.8% Sales Tax? The bulk of these new taxes don't kick in until 2013 (presumably after Obama's re-election). You can thank Nancy, Harry and Barack and your local Democrat Congressman for this one. If you sell your $400,000 home, there will be a $15,200 tax. This bill is set to screw the retiring generation who often downsize their homes. Is this Hope & Change great or what? Does this stuff makes (sic) your November and 2012 votes more important?

"Oh, you weren't aware this was in the Obamacare bill? Guess what, you aren't alone. There are more than a few members of Congress that aren't aware of it either (result of clandestine midnight voting for huge bills they've never read). AND, there are a few other surprises lurking."

Because this is a rumor with what is clearly a political slant, it's not surprising that PolitiFact has taken a look at it (the quote above is from their site as well).  They rated it "Pants on Fire".

To summarize PolitiFact, it's "capital gains" or profits from investment income that are taxed for Medicare.  If you look at your paycheck, you'll see a deduction on it for Medicare, but some people don't have that deduction, such as those Wall Street folks who live on "investment income."  So this new tax is for investment income, but not just any investment income, so don't worry about your stocks being taxed unless you're one of the high earners that are less than 5% of the US population.  If your investment income is more than 200,000 for individual or $250,000 for couples, than all dollars past this point will be taxed at 3.8%.

But, wait!  Home sales have their own exemptions, and for individuals, it's profit (not sales price) past $250,000 or $500,000 for couples.  Unless you think you're going to be able to sell your house at such an awesome price that you have $250,000 in profit (again, not sales price), this isn't going to apply to you.

Using the example cited in the e-mail, of the $400,000 home, let's assume you're a single individual and that this home magically came into your possession, so any sale is pure profit.  There's an exemption of $250,000, which leaves us with $150,000.  At 3.8%, this is a $5,700 tax.  That's out of $400,000 of pure profit.  Oh, the humanity, what a terrible burden!

Another site also debunks this, and throws in some free advice:

Step One: If you read something that seems as ridiculous as this does, don’t automatically believe it. (Had Congress passed a bill that was going to cost everyone who sells a home 3.8 percent of the proceeds, don’t you think you’d have heard about it long before now? Trust me – you’d certainly have read about it here!)

Step Two: Put the “facts” into your favorite search engine. In this case, for example, I did a search for “3.8% home sales tax.”

Step Three: Read some of the results. It took my search engine about one-third of a second to point me to several articles by actual journalists written over the last several months about this particular piece of disinformation.


Remember what I said earlier about being a responsible citizen and investigating before passing on rumors and e-mails?  For all of our sakes, please do.  Snopes and PolitiFact are great sites for debunking e-mails like this.