Tuesday, June 1, 2010

New Berlin Development Opposition Flyer

A flyer came my way from those opposed to the New Berlin Development by MSP. I am reproducing it below, with my comments in italics.
_______________________________________________________
New Berlin residents
This time…let your voice be heard!


A large low-income housing project is in its final stages of approval at City Hall.

We seem to have missed the February meeting in which the Mayor and Plan Commission discussed this development. They said was open to the public;
but no one seemed to know about it…that is…until they voted to approve it.
(This seems to imply that they were hiding this nefariously. Public meetings are a matteer of public record and have to be duly advertised beforehand. )

The target is for families of 3 or 4 people that earn less than $30k/year. (This according to the May 3rd article in New Berlin Now). The Plan was approved by the Mayor and the Plan Commission on May 3rd for the NB City Center that could have some devastating affects on our city and its residents such as:
(Tell me, what is the minimum income threshold to live in New Berlin? 40K? 80K? 100K?)

▪ Decreased land and home values in the surrounding area
(Studies have shown this is not true)
▪ Tax increases to expand or change the current school system for new kids
(Not true. The school system can easily absorb the estimated number of students.)
▪ A possible increase in security for local businesses
(Low income= criminal?)
▪A possible need for additional police presence
(That'd be true with any population increase)
▪ Parking issues and increased traffic in the heart of New Berlin
(Considering this area is projected to be developed, that's a weird argument)
▪ A possible expansion of Milwaukee City’s busing system
(And this is bad...why?)
▪ A possible increase in crime
(Can they do that? List the same reason in three different ways?)
▪ Destruction of land that supports wildlife in the “City of Trees”
(Again, since this area is to be developed eventually, an odd complaint)

Businesses continue to leave the heart of New Berlin, which means jobs are leaving our area. The City’s efforts should focus on bringing in new businesses to the area, not more people seeking those jobs!
(Based on what I read, businesses left Central City because it has not developed as projected and there is not enough local population to support them. In other words, this is precisely why this development should occur!)


There is an upcoming event that you need to know about!

Monday, June 7, 2010
Plan Commission Meeting, 6:00 PM
Council Chambers at City Hall

This meeting is open to the public and there will be privilege of the floor during the 15 minutes prior to the meeting. Those of you who are concerned about this development and the direction of your city, make a statement by coming to the meeting.


Mayor Chiovatero voted for this plan. His phone number is 262-797-2441. His email address is jchiovatero@newberlin.org.
The local Alderwoman for District 5 is Deena Liska. Her phone number is 262-424-4886. Her email address is dliska@newberlin.org.
(And what is yours?)

Spread the word - whatever the district - this is the heart of your city.
_______________________________________________________________
Many of those objections-if not all-would be true of ANY development. So why have I not heard of them protesting any other kind of development such as a middle-income single-family subdivision? After all, generally homeowners have more kids than apartment dwellers, so that's a bigger impact on schools. Let's see, hmm...fears of crime, fears of public transit....what's the word I'm looking for here, I can't quite think of it. I'm sure it'll come to me eventually.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

May I ask where you live? Do you live near a development like this. If not, enough said.

Anonymous said...

I live in New Berlin and really disagree with your commentary. Now the mayor believes that anyone that doesn't support this development is a bigot? I believe it is time for some new government officials.

Anonymous said...

funny, a friend of mine left a negative comment and you won't post it!!! I am sure I won't see this under comments either. Shame on you!!!

Max Max said...

First anonymous: No, I don't live near one, but only by chance. I actually looked at a few when apt hunting years ago, and was disappointed I didn't quality because the ones I looked at were very nice and close to where I work. They're still nice today. Have YOU talked to MSP and asked if you could tour some of their nearby developments?

Second anonymous: Well, how else would you explain why people are so focused on "workforce housing" of 72 units, yet not a peep about the 100-unit senior housing part?

Third anonymous: Comments are moderated, and whenever we see it, we'll post it. It may take some time. Sorry to disappoint you.

Betsy Foss-Campbell said...

Anonymous #3: You're right, I did reject one comment that made statements without supporting details. Please ask your friend to post his/her comment again, preferably with supporting details, and we will post it along with our reply. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I was at the meeting at the library last night. The discussion turned in a very weird direction. The folks were protesting the fact that high end condos and businesses were not being built in city center which they feel is a perfect place for such development. Now that it has been approved for workforce and senior housing, they became worried about garden snakes and badgers losing their home. I don't get it. What is wrong with good people who work in our city living in our city.

Max Max said...

Yes, I had the same thoughts about the school system. Leaving aside the fact that the school system can absorb those students, the original proposal by a different developer for high-end luxury condos woud've also sent students to the school system. Where were the protestors then?

Anonymous said...

RE: "(Based on what I read, businesses left Central City because it has not developed as projected and there is not enough local population to support them. In other words, this is precisely why this development should occur!)"

Brian - it is hilarious you mistake New Berlin "City Center" as "Central City" - Because that's what it will become like the central city.

HAHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHA!

Anonymous said...

I live in another WI city that keeps bringing in one low-income development after another, and believe me when I say it will definitely impact the area in a negative way. Low-income housing attracts many lowlife criminal and social program sucking leeches and all their relatives too. They will flock to your area, and bring their problems with them. I hope you can keep it out. They will crap on the entire area if they get a foothold there. Most of the considerable crime in my town happens in or near these low-income developments. If you don't believe me, put your money where your mouth is and move in or near one and see what it's like.

Max Max said...

"I live in another WI city that keeps bringing in one low-income development after another, and believe me when I say it will definitely impact the area in a negative way."

Are you confusing low-income housing tax credit developments with other kinds of private developments with bad management? Go to WHEDA or HUD and look for their lists of housing in Wisconsin. Are the places you're thinking of on those lists? I've heard people complaining about specific places that turned out to not be subsidized or tax-credit housing.

Don't confuse bad landlords with low-income housing.

Max Max said...

And yes, I made a mistake with "Central City" and "City Center" because of something else I read recently.

But come on, we're talking what, 72workforce housing out of how many total units that will eventually be developed in City Center? Those are working people who pay rent. Like someone else on a Journal Sentinel comment thread pointed out, the rent actually would be more than what is available at some of other apartments in New Berlin!

Anonymous said...

Then there is already "affordable" housiing in New Berlin??

And - the argument about "workforce" housing is needed for the businesses in New Berlin seems pretty weak. Last time I checked there was no shortage of people looking for jobs - the unemployment rate is at 9.7% - even with the cencus jobs that will disappear in a month or so.

Also - I'd like to work on the beach in Hawaii , but I can't afford to live on the beach - I demand they provide "affordable" housing there for me. B - can you help me out?

Sorry to call you out, but sounds like the same argument to me.

The market should decide the cost of products, services, and housing. If there is a need for a particular type of housing somewhere, someone will provide it without the need of government intervention.

Anonymous said...

How many units did Northridge start out with???

I believe Northridge started the same way - once deemed to be "High-End" development, couldn't fill it quickly enough and turned to subsidized housing - and poof! We have what Northridge is today.

Anonymous said...

By the way -- the flyer you cited was by an individual mom who took it upon herself to alert her neighbors about what was going on. I don't know who she is but I know that she did it. You may have found a different flyer in your paper box this weekend; that is from the official group, CCNB.